didyouvoteforthis.ca  ·  A Public Ledger of UCP Fiscal Decisions
// Running total since 2019 $74B+ in confirmed cost, lost investment & transferred liability to Albertans See the receipts
A companion to The Receipts

Alberta voted for affordability.
The receipt is on your bill.

Auto insurance, electricity, the income tax cut that arrived two years late, and the quiet legislative manoeuvre that takes most of it back. The four files of UCP affordability policy — documented in dollars Albertans can see on their own statements.

// The promise

The "Alberta Advantage" was supposed to mean cheaper. Lower taxes, cheaper utilities, cheaper insurance, more in your pocket.

That phrase — the Alberta Advantage — has been doing rhetorical work in this province for thirty years. Every UCP campaign has rested on some version of it. The 2019 platform promised tax relief and lower costs. The 2023 platform promised a personal income tax cut worth approximately $760 per year for any Albertan earning over $60,000. Premier Smith's economic messaging from 2022 onward has been built around the same idea: Alberta is the affordable place to live in Canada.

This page is the public record of what the Alberta Advantage looks like on a 2026 household budget. Each section pairs a UCP promise to a UCP action and shows the dollar-figure result on a typical Albertan's monthly bills. Where the data is contested, the friendlier-to-government number is used.

Affordability, as a campaign promise, is a number. The number is on your statement.

I. Auto insurance

2019—2027 · The cap that was lifted, then re-imposed, then raised

A single sequential story, six years long, that begins with the lifting of an existing cap and ends with a no-fault system that strips the right to sue. Each step was justified individually as good for affordability. The actuaries' projection for what comes next is below.

Entry 01

The NDP's 5% cap, scrapped immediately on taking office

The 5 per cent annual cap on auto insurance rate increases that the previous NDP government had imposed was, in the UCP's framing, "damaging to both industry and consumers" because it forced insurers to take "action to remain viable" and reduced consumer choice. Finance Minister Travis Toews argued in 2019 that the market would self-correct.

The cap was allowed to expire in October 2019. Within two months, CBC reported individual Albertan drivers seeing premiums jump 25 to 30 per cent on renewal. Edmonton driver Danny Parker, with a clean record, went from $1,350 to $1,885. Tofield driver Kim Zook went from $445 to $790.

The NDP finance critic at the time noted that Alberta auto insurance rose by as much as 30 per cent during the 2020-21 pandemic period — a time when Albertans were driving and working less.

Entry 02

The 2023 freeze, the 2024 cap at 3.7%, the 2025 cap raised to 7.5% — and 12.5% for everyone else

By January 2023, the Smith government implemented a "rate increase pause" through the end of the year. In 2024, that pause was replaced by a 3.7 per cent cap for "good drivers." In 2025, Finance Minister Nate Horner raised that cap to 7.5 per cent and signalled the change was necessary to maintain "viability" in the market. Premier Smith and Affordability Minister Nathan Neudorf framed both moves as protections for drivers.

The 7.5 per cent cap applies only to drivers with no minor traffic convictions in the past three years. For everyone else, the Automobile Insurance Rate Board can approve average rate hikes of up to 12.5 per cent. Of the 67 auto insurers operating in Alberta in 2023, the Superintendent of Insurance estimated one-third lost money. Two private insurers exited the province citing margins.

MNP, in a published actuarial report cited in the legislature, projects auto insurance premiums in Alberta will increase by 87.6 per cent over the next decade if the current rate cap structure remains in place.

Entry 03

Bill 47, the no-fault system, and the right to sue, repealed

Bill 47, the Automobile Insurance Act, received Royal Assent in 2025 and is to take effect in 2027. It moves Alberta to what the government calls a "care-first" auto insurance system. The framing: faster medical, rehabilitation, and income-support benefits for accident victims, without the need to sue. Premier Smith repeatedly cited Saskatchewan's no-fault system as a model.

Government-commissioned reports estimated the move could reduce average premiums by approximately 20 per cent.

Bill 47 strips Albertans of the right to sue at-fault drivers in most collision injury cases. Instead, accident victims will receive compensation at rates set by the government.

The same government-commissioned reports project the loss of 650 to 800 jobs in legal services in Alberta as a result.

At the UCP's own 2024 annual convention, personal injury lawyer Steve Assiff told Premier Smith and Finance Minister Horner directly that the move would be "political suicide" for the party because "you're taking rights away from Albertans. That is un-conservative."

The government rejected a publicly-delivered alternative (as in Saskatchewan) on the grounds that startup costs would approach $3 billion. Independent estimates suggest a public option would deliver larger consumer savings than the private no-fault model.

II. Electricity

2001—Present · Deregulation, the spike, and the "Rate of Last Resort"

Alberta's electricity market has been deregulated since 2001 — a structural inheritance from the Klein-era Progressive Conservative government, not the UCP. But how that market has been managed during the volatility of 2021–2024, and whose interests it has served, are policy choices the current government owns.

Entry 04

$7 billion in residential overpayments since deregulation — by an average of $690 per household, per year

When Alberta's electricity market was deregulated in 2001, the political case was that competition would drive prices down. Twenty-four years later, the Alberta government's own Affordability and Utilities Ministry continues to describe the deregulated market as a consumer benefit — pointing to "the optionality to shop around."

An analysis published in 2024 found that since 2001, Alberta's residential electricity consumer price index has risen 1.8 percentage points per year faster than the Canadian national average.

The cumulative result, on the consumer side: Albertans have collectively paid an estimated $24 billion more for electricity than they would have under prices comparable to other Canadian jurisdictions. Residential consumers alone account for approximately $7 billion of that amount — an average of $690 per household per year for each of the 24 years since deregulation.

Industrial, commercial, and farm customers absorbed the remaining $17 billion. As of Q1 2024, five companies control 54 per cent of Alberta's electricity generation market.

Entry 05

The Regulated Rate Option spiked at 32¢ per kWh in 2024. The replacement is fixed above market rates.

In April 2024, Affordability and Utilities Minister Nathan Neudorf announced that the longstanding "Regulated Rate Option" (RRO) would be rebranded as the "Rate of Last Resort" (RoLR). Effective January 2025, the new RoLR would be set at a fixed rate of approximately 12 cents per kWh for two years, intended to "protect Albertans from volatile pricing."

The RRO had reached peaks of 32 cents per kWh during the 2022–2024 spike, with monthly bills described in mainstream coverage as "massive." But the new 12-cent RoLR is itself higher than what most competitive fixed-rate plans were offering at the time of its introduction. The Alberta Utilities Commission's own data shows wholesale pool prices in late 2025 averaging around 2.9 cents per kWh.

University of Calgary economist Blake Shaffer told CBC the rebranded "Rate of Last Resort" is, in practical terms, more expensive than fixed-rate alternatives available in the market. Approximately 413,000 Alberta households were on the default rate as of June 2024.

Meanwhile, in 2024, Alberta accounted for 86 per cent of all Level 3 grid emergency alerts in North America — the most severe category, indicating that rolling blackouts are likely or already in progress — on the same grid the deregulated market is supposed to be optimising.

III. The income tax cut, deferred and partially withdrawn

2023—2027 · The keystone affordability promise

The most prominent affordability commitment in the UCP's 2023 election platform was a personal income tax cut. Premier Smith has subsequently said publicly that deferring it was a mistake. The legislation that finally delivered it includes a separate provision that takes much of it back.

Entry 06

The $760 promise — delivered two years late, at half-strength

A re-elected UCP government would create a new eight-per-cent tax bracket on income under $60,000, saving Albertans approximately $760 a year.
— UCP 2023 campaign platform commitment

The promise was the keystone affordability message of the 2023 campaign. It was repeated by Smith and finance critic candidates throughout the writ period. It was not phrased as conditional on commodity prices or fiscal capacity. It was a campaign deliverable: "$760 a year."

Budget 2024 (Finance Minister Horner's first): the cut was deferred. The promised 8 per cent bracket was pushed to a future date contingent on "sufficient fiscal capacity to introduce the cut while maintaining a balanced budget."

Budget 2025: a 9 per cent bracket arrived for 2026. The promised 8 per cent rate was delayed to 2027, again contingent on fiscal capacity.

Premier Smith, in a December 2024 year-end interview with The Canadian Press, addressed the deferral directly:

We probably should have brought the tax cut in our first budget. We did hear that that was something that disappointed the people who supported us. It may have been better for Albertans if we'd implemented and then found a way to be able to pay for it.
— Premier Danielle Smith, December 2024
Entry 07

Bill 32, the "Alberta Escalator," and the legal analysis warning it may violate the Taxpayer Protection Act

Bill 32 (the Financial Statutes Amendment Act, 2024) introduced what tax practitioners have nicknamed the "Alberta Escalator" — a mechanism by which Alberta's personal tax brackets and basic personal amount can be deindexed from inflation and instead adjusted at a politically determined rate.

The government's framing positioned this as a routine fiscal tool needed to manage budget pressures.

A detailed analysis published by the law firm Borden Ladner Gervais (BLG) in March 2025 demonstrated that the Escalator's effect erodes most or all of the savings the government's $760 tax cut is supposed to deliver.

BLG's modelling, run on an Albertan earning $60,000 with 2.9 per cent annual income growth: without the Escalator, the new bracket cuts effective tax meaningfully. With the Escalator, the same taxpayer pays more under the new bracket structure than they would have without it — the effective rate climbs to 5.20 per cent by 2029.

The same BLG analysis observed that the Escalator "appears to operate contrary to the recently amended Alberta Taxpayer Protection Act" — the legislation that prohibits reducing personal income tax bracket thresholds and basic personal amounts without a referendum.

In other words: the government promised a $760 tax cut, deferred it twice, then introduced legislation that quietly rolls back most of the savings — via a mechanism the law firm reviewing it suggests may itself be illegal.

IV. The bills that did arrive on time

Property tax, education levy, EV registration

The income tax cut was deferred for two years. The fees, levies, and education property taxes that were introduced or increased in the same period were not.

Entry 08

Education property tax up — $239 more for the median Calgary homeowner, $92 for Edmonton

Premier Smith and Finance Minister Horner defended Budget 2025's increase to the education property tax as a contribution from communities that would benefit from new schools. The province had committed $8.6 billion over three years to school construction in response to record migration.

To be able to have a little bit of support from the communities that are going to be the greatest beneficiaries of that new construction is part of what we had in mind.
— Premier Smith, February 2025

The increase added $239 to the median Calgary homeowner's annual property tax bill and $92 to the median Edmonton bill, calculated against assessed value. More than half of Alberta's population lives in those two cities.

Tyler Gandam, head of the umbrella organisation representing Alberta's towns and cities, told reporters the property tax increase took municipal leaders by surprise and that better options had been available.

Calculated against the deferred $760 personal income tax cut: the median Calgary homeowner is paying roughly $239 more in education property tax in the year before the partial 9% bracket arrives. The household-level affordability arithmetic, in other words, is approximately neutral or negative for many Albertans — before considering insurance and utilities.

Entry 09

The federal carbon tax was killed. The provincial fuel tax was kept.

For six years, Premier Kenney and Premier Smith blamed the federal carbon tax for the cost of living in Alberta. Smith took Ottawa to court over it. Kenney made it the centerpiece of the UCP's first 2019 election campaign. The provincial fuel tax holiday from April 2022 to December 2023 was framed by Kenney himself as a "back-door way to scrapping federal carbon tax."

On March 14, 2025, Prime Minister Mark Carney signed a directive eliminating the federal consumer carbon tax, effective April 1.

Alberta's provincial fuel tax of 13 cents per litre remained at full strength through 2025 and into 2026. The province operates an "oil price-based fuel tax relief program" tied to the price of West Texas Intermediate — the tax suspends only above $90/barrel WTI; with oil trading well below that level, the full 13¢ remains.

When the Canadian Taxpayers Federation called for an extension of the fuel tax holiday in mid-2024, citing the province's then-$5.5 billion surplus, Finance Minister Horner declined. He described the fuel tax as "a stable component of Alberta's revenue mix."

The CTF's Alberta director Kris Sims publicly noted: "Manitoba's NDP Premier Wab Kinew is fully suspending his fuel tax on Jan. 1, so do we want Albertans paying higher fuel taxes than in Manitoba?" When even the Canadian Taxpayers Federation is calling out a UCP government for refusing to cut a tax, the political case for the cut has been made by the friendliest possible witness. The tax was kept anyway.

Entry 10

MLAs raised their own pay and added a transition allowance. The minimum wage was frozen for the eighth straight year.

On January 9, 2025, the UCP majority on the Special Standing Committee on Members' Services voted on a package of compensation and funding changes:

  • MLA salaries increased 2.2 per cent, retroactive to January 1. The first MLA pay raise since 2013.
  • UCP caucus funding increased by approximately $1 million — a more-than-25-per-cent increase — for "research support and public communications."
  • A new transition allowance created — one month of pay for every year served, up to six months — for MLAs leaving office. The Opposition NDP called it a "golden parachute."

The current annual base salary for an Alberta MLA is approximately $121,000, with extra pay for cabinet positions on top.

Alberta's minimum wage has been frozen at $15.00 per hour since October 2018 — eight years and counting. In 2018 it was the highest minimum wage in Canada. As of late 2025, with other provinces having raised theirs repeatedly, Alberta now has the lowest minimum wage in Canada.

In November 2025, the UCP voted down NDP MLA Kathleen Ganley's Bill 201, which would have raised the minimum wage by $1 per year for three years and scrapped the lower wage for under-18 workers. Premier Smith argued previous wage increases hurt rural youth employment.

The arithmetic: a minimum wage worker earning $15/hour for a 40-hour week earns approximately $31,200 per year. The 2.2 per cent MLA salary increase is approximately $2,660 per yearmore than 8 per cent of a minimum wage worker's entire annual income. NDP MLA Marie Renaud called it "foul" that the government was raising its own pay while "capping benefits for the poorest people in the province."

Entry 11

Caps on auto insurance, yes. Caps on rent, no.

"Alberta's government will not introduce rent control."

— Heather Barlow, press secretary to Seniors, Community and Social Services Minister Jason Nixon, on the record

The UCP's framing is that rent caps are "devastating" to housing supply and that the answer is more construction. The government's strategy: $9 billion to subsidise developers, with a target of 25,000 new affordable housing units by 2031 — approximately 2,500 per year against the population growth Alberta has seen since 2022.

In December 2023, NDP MLA Janis Irwin introduced Bill 205, the Housing Statutes (Housing Security) Amendment Act, which would have temporarily capped rent increases at 2 per cent for two years, then tied subsequent increases to CPI to a maximum of 5 per cent. The bill was voted down by the UCP majority.

The province's own affordable housing program fell short of its target in fiscal 2024, delivering 798 combined units and rent supplements against a target of 1,500 — with the year ending in an $8.2 billion provincial surplus.

The contradiction the page is asking the reader to consider: The same UCP government that re-imposed an auto insurance rate cap in 2023 (after letting the NDP's expire in 2019), and that imposed a 7.5 per cent good-driver cap in 2025, refuses on principle to cap residential rent increases. "Caps don't work" is, evidently, a context-dependent objection. They work for insurance companies. They do not work for landlords.

V. The carpet

May 2025 · The detail that lodges in voters' minds

Most failures of fiscal-conservative governance arrive in numbers too large to feel: a billion here, ten billion there, $74 billion cumulatively. This one is different. This one fits in a single news clip and, at the time of writing, has been widely shared as an emblem of the Smith government's spending priorities. It deserves its own line on the ledger.

Entry 12

$280,000 for new carpet in the Premier's office. The Finance Minister, defending it: "the member is not wrong."

The province's Infrastructure Ministry, in a statement to media after the spending was raised in question period, defended the cost: the previous carpet in the 6,500-square-foot legislature space was more than 20 years old and "in poor condition, riddled with stains, rips and tears." The total of approximately $280,000 covered the new red carpet, abatement work, and removal of the old carpet.

Independent MLA Scott Sinclair raised the spending in question period, framing it against the province's then-projected $5 billion deficit:

To the premier: Do you think spending a quarter-million dollars to roll yourself out on a red carpet every day is a responsible way of spending taxpayers' money when you run Trudeau-style deficits? Don't you think this kind of luxurious spending sends the wrong message to everyday Albertans when we can't get highways and health care?
— Independent MLA Scott Sinclair, May 2025

Premier Smith was not in the chamber to respond. Finance Minister Nate Horner stood up to answer the question in her place. His response, on the public record:

You know, the member is not wrong. Highways, hospitals, schools: these are all our fundamental, principal concerns.
— Finance Minister Nate Horner, May 2025

Horner's full response then pivoted to the income tax cut as the government's affordability answer. But the four words that survived — "the member is not wrong" — are the receipt. The Finance Minister of Alberta, in question period, openly acknowledged that the spending priorities were misaligned. He did not dispute the framing. He conceded it.

For context: $280,000 is approximately the annual gross income of nine minimum-wage workers combined, calculated against the wage that has been frozen since October 2018 (see Entry 10). It is roughly the entire LPRT compensation paid to the Finance Minister's own ranching business since 2021, three times over (see Receipt 13 on the front page).

// The household ledger · A composite Alberta family

What the "Alberta Advantage" looks like on a 2026 statement, for a Calgary household earning $90,000

This is an illustrative composite, calculated against the documented figures in the entries above. It uses the friendlier-to-government numbers throughout (good driver auto cap, the partial 9% income tax bracket, the median Calgary education property tax increase, the AFL average residential electricity overpayment).

Auto insurance cap raised to 7.5% per year for "good drivers" (annual increase on a $1,800 premium)
+$135/yr
Average residential electricity overpayment vs Canadian average (AFL/Mackenzie analysis, 24-year average)
+$690/yr
Education property tax increase, median Calgary homeowner (Budget 2025)
+$239/yr
Provincial fuel tax kept at 13¢/litre after federal carbon tax killed (15,000 km/yr at 9 L/100 km, vs Manitoba's suspended tax)
+$176/yr
Income tax savings, partial 9% bracket arriving in 2026 (approximately half of the $760 promise)
−$380/yr
Net annual cost
+$860/yr

This calculation excludes Bill 47 no-fault premium uncertainty, EV registration tax (introduced January 2025), the rent-cap-refused exposure for renters, and the projected MNP figure of an 87.6% auto insurance increase by 2034 if current rate caps remain. It also excludes the Alberta Escalator's erosion of the income tax cut over time. The figure above is the optimistic scenario. For renters, add the difference between actual rent increases and a 2 per cent cap. For minimum-wage workers, add the eight years of frozen wage versus public-sector indexed pay.

// What this page is asking you to consider

An "Alberta Advantage" that costs the median household $860 per year more is not an advantage. It is a slogan.

The pages on this site documenting receipts and conduct describe failures of governance at the provincial level — failures that are real but that most Albertans experience second-hand, through reporting on procurement decisions or auditor general findings. This page describes failures Albertans experience first-hand, on bills they open every month.

Each entry above involves a UCP decision, a UCP bill, or a UCP framing. Each one was justified individually as good for affordability. The cumulative effect, on a representative Calgary household earning $90,000, is documented in the ledger above. The figure is positive in only one direction: the wrong one for the household.

The "Alberta Advantage" is a real political concept worth defending. It once described the lowest top combined personal income tax rate in North America, the absence of a provincial sales tax, low utilities, and predictable consumer costs — a coherent fiscal-conservative achievement built over decades. The version of the Alberta Advantage being delivered by the current government is not that achievement. It is the marketing for it.

Alberta voted for affordability. The receipt is on your statement. Add it up.