didyouvoteforthis.ca  ·  A Public Ledger of UCP Fiscal Decisions
// Running total since 2019 $74B+ in confirmed cost, lost investment & transferred liability to Albertans See the receipts
A companion to The Receipts

Alberta voted for accountability. We got self-review.

Accountability is not a sentiment. It is a system: independent officers, arms-length boards, ethical guardrails written into statute, and a press able to access the documents that document the decisions. This page documents what has happened to that system in Alberta — the conflicts left in plain view, the reviews scoped by the reviewed, the apparatus of disclosure that has, by legislation, been narrowed.

// On what is — and is not — on this page

None of the items below allege that any individual has broken the law. Several of them allege exactly the opposite: that the conduct described is legal, and that the legality is itself the problem. Where conduct has been described in mainstream Canadian publications, the source is cited. Where the Auditor General has flagged a problem, the year and report are cited. Where the relevant party has issued a denial, the denial is on the page.

The cumulative weight of what is on the public record is the point. Any single item on this page might be defensible in isolation. The pattern is what the page is for.

I. The system, with him as an example

Investigative reporting · April 2026

The Finance Minister of the government that has not reformed Alberta's grazing-lease compensation system in eleven years is among the system's beneficiaries. The payments are legal. The Auditor General said the legislation needed reform a decade ago. It has not been reformed.

CASE 01 · FEATURED

Nate Horner Ranches Ltd. and the system the Auditor General called out in 2015

Reporting by The Narwhal · April 29 — 30, 2026  ·  Hon. Nate Horner, Minister of Finance

II. The reviews, scoped by the reviewed

Independent in name · Pattern in practice

A review is independent if its scope, its access to documents, and its choice of witnesses are not determined by the body being reviewed. By that definition, several of the principal accountability instruments deployed in Alberta since 2019 have not been independent in the relevant sense.

Terms of reference set by reviewed government

The Wyant Review — what it could not look at, and why

October 2025  ·  Hon. Raymond Wyant (ret.)

Retired Manitoba judge Raymond Wyant was appointed by the Government of Alberta to conduct a third-party review of the AHS procurement matters surfaced by the Mentzelopoulos lawsuit. The terms of reference for that review were set by the same government whose conduct was the subject of the review.

The terms of reference excluded several of the most-reported elements of the matter:

  • The $1.6‑million home rented by then-chief of staff Marshall Smith from a Mraiche family member.
  • The Edmonton Oilers playoff luxury-box tickets accepted by multiple cabinet ministers.
  • The hiring of Mraiche relatives into government-related roles.

Wyant interviewed only one member of political staff — Marshall Smith. The report concluded that AHS had failed to follow its own procurement procedures, and that the Health Ministry and AHS had failed to follow their own rules in signing off on a private surgical centre. Both findings are damning. Both were also bounded by the questions Wyant was permitted to ask.

Commissioner's prior political donations on the record

Steve Allan and the Allan Inquiry

2019 — 2021  ·  Public Inquiry into Anti-Alberta Energy Campaigns

Forensic accountant Steve Allan was appointed by the Kenney government to lead the Public Inquiry into Anti-Alberta Energy Campaigns — the so-called Allan Inquiry. Public records establish that Steve Allan had, prior to his appointment, donated to the UCP leadership campaign of the Justice Minister who appointed him to the role. The inquiry's $3.5-million budget is documented on the Receipts page.

The independence of an inquiry is not measured solely by the qualifications of the inquirer. It is measured by the absence of relationships of obligation between the inquirer and the appointing authority. That measurement was not met here. The inquiry found no wrongdoing by the campaigns it investigated.

Regulatory decisions made in private

The AER and the orphan-well levy decisions, behind closed doors

2020 — Present  ·  Alberta Energy Regulator  ·  Documented by University of Calgary researcher Drew Yewchuk

The Alberta Energy Regulator is the body that licenses oil and gas operations in the province, sets the orphan-well levy that funds the Orphan Well Association, and is the gatekeeper for whether a producer in financial distress is permitted to acquire additional wells. Several of the AER's most consequential decisions in recent years — including the size and structure of the orphan-well levy — have been made in proceedings that are not subject to public hearings, and whose internal correspondence has not been released.

University of Calgary researcher Drew Yewchuk has documented, in legal commentary and FOIP requests, the gap between the AER's stated transparency posture and the actual public availability of the records that would document its decisions. The orphan-well liability transferred to Albertans — $30 billion and counting — is a function of decisions whose underlying documents the public has not seen.

III. Conflicts in plain view

Documented relationships · No allegations of illegality

Each of the entries in this section concerns a relationship that is on the public record and has not been disputed. None of these relationships is, on its own, evidence that any decision was made improperly. The point is the volume and the pattern.

Sole-sourced contract · Ethics complaint filed

David Yager — authoring oil-cleanup policy while consulting for industry

July 2025  ·  Ethics complaint by Dwight Popowich  ·  1,700 Albertans wrote the Ethics Commissioner

David Yager has held a sole-sourced contract from the Government of Alberta to advise on oil-and-gas cleanup policy. During the period of that contract, Yager has been a paid consultant to oil-and-gas industry interests, and is a member of the board of the Alberta Energy Regulator — the body that licenses the cleanup of those interests.

In July 2025, Albertan Dwight Popowich filed an ethics complaint with the Office of the Ethics Commissioner of Alberta. The complaint was followed by approximately 1,700 letters from Albertans to the Ethics Commissioner. The matter remains before the Commissioner.

$1.6M residence · Hiring of relatives documented

Marshall Smith — the rented home, the relatives, and the only staff member Wyant interviewed

2023 — Present  ·  Former Chief of Staff to Premier Smith

Marshall Smith, then chief of staff to Premier Smith, moved into a $1.6‑million home in August 2023 that had been purchased by Fatima Mraiche, the sister of Sam Mraiche, whose companies have received approximately $614 million in AHS contracts according to the Mentzelopoulos lawsuit. Marshall Smith subsequently hired multiple Mraiche relatives, including Sam Mraiche's son Khalil, into government-related roles.

Marshall Smith was the only member of political staff interviewed by retired judge Raymond Wyant during the government-commissioned review of the AHS procurement matter. He has denied any improper involvement in contract decisions.

Documented family connection

Mickey Amery — Justice Minister, friend and relative of Sam Mraiche

Documented by the Globe and Mail  ·  Hon. Mickey Amery, Minister of Justice

The Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Alberta has been described in Globe and Mail reporting as a friend and relative of Sam Mraiche. The Minister of Justice is the cabinet member responsible for the appointment of Crown prosecutors, and is the primary political principal of the province's prosecution service. He has not, to the public knowledge, recused himself from any matter touching on the AHS procurement file.

IV. The transparency apparatus, narrowed

Statute change · Information Commissioner findings on the record

The most consequential accountability decisions of the UCP era have been the ones that change what can be obtained, what can be asked, and what can be answered. None of them are scandals in the ordinary sense; they are statutory and procedural changes to the system that scandals are normally surfaced through.

In force June 11, 2025 OIPC findings on the record

FOIP → ATIA — the legislation that codified the practices the Information Commissioner had called illegal

Bill 23 · In force June 11, 2025  ·  Access to Information Act

On June 11, 2025, the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act — FOIP — was repealed and replaced by the Access to Information Act, ATIA. The replacement was tabled by the Smith government and passed under government majority. One month earlier, in May 2025, the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner had issued a report finding that the Government of Alberta was already failing to comply with the existing FOIP statute.

What the Commissioner said the government was already doing wrong

  • Disregarding access requests as "overly broad" without legal basis.
  • Applying Cabinet-record exemptions in ways that exceeded their statutory scope.
  • Treating political-staff communications as exempt where the statute did not exempt them.

What ATIA does

The new statute codifies several of the practices the Commissioner had identified as illegal under FOIP. Key changes documented by independent legal commentary:

  • Statutory discretion to disregard requests as "overly broad" — previously a practice without legal basis, now a statutory authority.
  • Cabinet-record exemptions expanded to include "background and factual information" not previously exempt.
  • Communications of political staff are now exempt as a matter of law.
  • Increased OIPC discretion to refuse inquiries.

The Information and Privacy Commissioner is an independent officer of the Legislative Assembly. Her finding that the practices in question were illegal under FOIP is on the public record. The legislature responded by changing the law.

Code amendment · Gift-acceptance threshold lowered

The ethics framework, amended — gifts under "official business"

Conflicts of Interest Act — subsequent amendments  ·  Members and Cabinet

Subsequent to the Mraiche-related disclosures, amendments were made to the framework governing the acceptance of gifts and benefits by members and cabinet. The practical effect of those amendments has been to broaden the scope of what may be accepted, characterised as in the course of "official business," without triggering disclosure obligations.

A more permissive gift-acceptance regime is, in principle, a policy choice. The choice is documented on the legislative record. It is not a choice typically made when an existing regime is functioning well.

Tabling refused twice in Question Period

The Saudi-flight Ethics Commissioner correspondence, twice declined

November 2025 onward  ·  Premier Smith

The Premier has, on two separate occasions in Question Period, been asked to table the correspondence between her office and the Office of the Ethics Commissioner concerning the Saudi-paid private-jet travel of October 2025. She has declined both requests. The full record on the Saudi flight is on the Transparency page.

V. The travel

Public expense · Discretionary class of service

Travel by ministers and senior officials is a normal part of government, and the cost is a normal part of the public accounts. What is not normal is the choice of class of service, the choice of destination, and the disclosure posture.

First-class travel · Mar-a-Lago itinerary

Rob Anderson — first-class travel and the Mar-a-Lago trip

Reporting on file  ·  Rob Anderson, former Premier's Office Principal Secretary

Rob Anderson, the former Principal Secretary to Premier Smith, has been the subject of public reporting concerning a first-class flight booked at public expense and a separate trip to Mar-a-Lago in Florida. The choice of class of service is, on Government of Alberta travel policy, discretionary above a certain threshold. Mar-a-Lago is a private club. The combination of public expense and private-club venue is what makes the file a public-record matter.

// What this page is for

Accountability is not the absence of scandal. It is the presence of a system that surfaces them.

The system that surfaces scandals is independent officers, statutory disclosure requirements, recusal obligations, terms of reference written by parties other than the reviewed, and a press able to obtain documents under access-to-information legislation. Each of those instruments has been narrowed in Alberta since 2019.

The pattern is not that one minister has a conflict. The pattern is that the apparatus designed to manage conflicts has been narrowed at the same time the conflicts have multiplied.

Items on this page that are flagged with placeholder source links will be filled in as the underlying public records are confirmed. If you have a primary document — an FOI release, a tabled record, a court filing — the corrections inbox is below.

// On what is — and is not — on this page

Items based on anonymous sources, social-media speculation, or unverifiable third-hand claims do not appear here. Where a person or organisation has publicly denied an allegation, the denial is on the page. Where conduct is documented as legal, that is also on the page.

Legal is not the same as appropriate, and appropriate is not the same as accountable. The page is a record of accountability questions, not a finding on any of them.